License please
And the laugh of the week goes to the U.K. governments suggestion that they may soon be implementing smoking licences (article). I just cannot believe how ridiculous some government measures seem to be lately. It would not worry me but since the media thrives on panic and terror alot of the public seem to actually fall victim to the scare tactics and may start believing they are not capable of buying (or not buying) a packet of cigarettes without first having jumped through hoops for the government that is apparently elected serve them.
A license to smoke? It is just so laughable. What makes it even more ridiculous is the fact the consultant who thinks it might be a good idea has said the form will be complex and tricky to further deter would be smokers. As if any government needs to actively try to make a form complex. Once I fill in the form, have my photo taken, and send it in with a £10 processing charge I am then issued a license that is valid for one year... so the next year it all starts again.
What has intrigued me is the number of non-smokers who have used article comment sections to say how great an idea it is because people smoke outside buildings/smoke near their kids/stink.. etc. I am not sure why they think this will change if someone has to register to smoke. Their problem is not with smokers as a whole it is with people who are rude. I would never smoke near a child, or smoke near people eating etc. I had to step over at least 4 different puddles of vomit on my way to work this morning but I am not suggesting a license be required to buy kebabs after dark. Also, if smoking stops killing all these thousands of people then the government will be seeking to cover the loss of money from cigarette taxes with some other levy and pension services are going to be further strained.
It must also be obvious that if the government were able to dupe the public into accepting smoking licenses then their decent further into the bully/nanny state would surely continue. With a little effort we could soon spend our lives applying for the privilege to live with the drinking licenses, blogging licenses, sex licenses, voting licenses, etc.
Charlie Brooker has a hilarious take on the future here.
A license to smoke? It is just so laughable. What makes it even more ridiculous is the fact the consultant who thinks it might be a good idea has said the form will be complex and tricky to further deter would be smokers. As if any government needs to actively try to make a form complex. Once I fill in the form, have my photo taken, and send it in with a £10 processing charge I am then issued a license that is valid for one year... so the next year it all starts again.
What has intrigued me is the number of non-smokers who have used article comment sections to say how great an idea it is because people smoke outside buildings/smoke near their kids/stink.. etc. I am not sure why they think this will change if someone has to register to smoke. Their problem is not with smokers as a whole it is with people who are rude. I would never smoke near a child, or smoke near people eating etc. I had to step over at least 4 different puddles of vomit on my way to work this morning but I am not suggesting a license be required to buy kebabs after dark. Also, if smoking stops killing all these thousands of people then the government will be seeking to cover the loss of money from cigarette taxes with some other levy and pension services are going to be further strained.
It must also be obvious that if the government were able to dupe the public into accepting smoking licenses then their decent further into the bully/nanny state would surely continue. With a little effort we could soon spend our lives applying for the privilege to live with the drinking licenses, blogging licenses, sex licenses, voting licenses, etc.
Charlie Brooker has a hilarious take on the future here.
